Wednesday, 16 July 2008

PC bullies from the Immigrant Council of Ireland swing into action against Kevin Myers

From yesterday's Irish Times:
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
ICI claims article was 'racially offensive'

CHARLIE TAYLOR

The Immigrant Council of Ireland (ICI) is to make an official complaint to the Garda Síochána today about the publication of what it considers to be a racially offensive article that appeared in the Irish Independent last week.

The ICI said it believed the publication of the article, “Africa is giving nothing to anyone – apart from AIDS ”, which was written by columnist Kevin Myers and published last Thursday, breached Section 2 of the Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act 1989.

Section 2 of the Act says it is an offence to publish or distribute written material if it is threatening, abusive or insulting and intended to, or having regarding to all of the circumstances, is likely to, stir up hatred.... [link]
Here is the original piece by Myers.

The ICI people (and, I'm sure, loads of PC folks) seem to have missed
the main point that Myers was making -- we should question ourselves as to how moral it is to support societal systems in which more and more people will inevitably suffer.

Well, how moral is it? It doesn't seem very moral to me. It just seems as though we are coddling our own, personal moral sentiments and avoiding truly tough decisions. I don't really blame anyone for this though, for we are probably "wired" to think/feel in these ways thanks to the evolutionary track that we happened to follow.

It's too bad Myers didn't offer some alternative suggestions as to what to do about the problems in Africa. I don't have any answers, but some intelligent (and brave) folks out there do. As I said in the comments in a previous post:
The West has treated -- and still is treating -- Africans abominably, there is no doubt about that. But our behaviours do not account for why sub-Saharan Africans do poorly in terms of nation building or on the international political/economic scene.

The explanation lies in intelligence (IQ) as well as temperament....

[I]f we
really want to help Africans, we need to find out the true root of their problems and if we don't discuss the IQ we will never be able to rule it in or out as one of the things that needs to be fixed or at least mediated (of course we also need to do other things to help Africans like engage in proper trade with them, etc.)
More specifically, from Steve Sailer:
Of course, if, like most American opinion-leaders, you never allowed yourself to think about IQ, then you wouldn't know that the sad state of Africa stems in part from IQ deficiencies.

Nor would you know that it's likely that Africa's average IQ could be raised.

Indeed, the heavyweight psychometricians backed by the much-denounced Pioneer Fund, such as Lynn, the late Hans Eysenck, and Arthur Jensen, have long pointed to vitamin and mineral deficiencies in Third World diets as a likely contributor to low average IQs.

The Pioneer Fund website says specifically:

"Some research has demonstrated that food supplements have the potential to enhance cognitive ability. Most non-genetic explanations for IQ deficits in non-developed countries have focused entirely on cultural factors such as prejudice, poor education, and poverty. The biological, but not genetic contribution to cognitive ability has largely been ignored. However, we do know that minute daily additions of essential amino acids, minerals, vitamins, and other trace elements can be critical. (Malnutrition in childhood is a different phenomenon.) There may even be group differences in the optimal daily requirements of these substances. Research of this kind carried out in developing countries such as South Africa could pay great dividends."

Now, in a stunning vindication for IQ realists, the Associated Press has reported (March 25):

The brainpower of entire nations has diminished because of a shortage of the right vitamins, and slipping nutrients into people's food seems to be the only solution, a new U.N. survey says."

This survey, co-produced by UNICEF and the Micronutrient Initiative, begins:

"Few outside specialist circles are aware of the scale and severity of vitamin and mineral deficiency, or of what it means for individuals and for nations. It means the impairment of hundreds of millions of growing minds and the lowering of national IQs… And it means the large-scale loss of national energies, intellects, productivity, and growth."
For Sailer's links and to read the whole piece click here.

The ICI and other PC thinkers will do Africans (or other disadvantaged peoples) no favours by stiffling the discussion of the problems in Africa. What they will be doing -- as nearly all PC thinking does -- is
to continue to prolong the suffering of Africans, just as the never ending donations do. But that, then, is perhaps the point -- if we don't ever truly help these people, they won't ever become our economic competitors.

Email the ICI folks to let them know what you think.

Previously: Kevin Myers on charity to Africa


Update >>

Letters to the Independent. I count 16 that are pro-Myers and 4 anti-Myers (there is sometimes more than one letter per webpage):

Western aid not helpful
Well done for saying it as it is
They must care for their own
Let's face up to brutal reality of Africa (3 letters)
Thanks for brave article on Africa
Life is not always worth preserving
It's high time we cut all African aid
Refreshing view...Bono and Bob...PC mob...Nasty people... (5 letters)
Starving people betrayed by own rulers (2 letters)

Wishing death on children is sick
This is not an Africa I recognise
Mr Myers wants the final solution
Why attack the people of Africa?

Also, in the Irish Times, a commentary by Bryan Mukandi: "Intolerant words starve Africans of the chance they deserve"

This is not a hate site

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh, that's just outrageous! I disagree with Kevin Myers's article, but it's a valid point of view, and even if it wasn't, the notion that serious opinions should be suppressed is so dangerous. I don't think we can exaggerate how sinister this phenomenon of "hate speech" censorsip and ever-expanding equality legislation is. I think there's a serious danger that a blog like this, for instance, will be illegal within ten years, or that EU equality legislation will make it an offence to criticise immigration or multiculturalism during a tea-beak conversation at work. No doubt it will be considered "creating a hostile environment" and discriminating against non-national workers. A girl in my job put up a poster promoting a "Say No to Ageism" campaign. I have no objection to that, but if I put up a "Say No to Immigration" poster, would I get away with that? The public sphere is being ideologically loaded under a flag of ersatz neutrality, and a particular political and social view is being naturalised, all the time. Maolsheachlann.

bogsidebunny said...

Looks like the self-appointed, slimeball "anti-racist" Nazis are going to have their "Chrystal Nacht" at the expense of a very popular, adroit scholar. Incidently, for the record, I agree 100% with everything Mr Myers said in the controversial article. Does that make me an accomplice to racism? Probably according to the contrive "rules" set down by the ICI. Well Imigrant Council of Ireland you can shove your bully tactics right up your collective a*ses!

Their Canadian ilk tried the very same thing in Canada with yet another conveyer of the truth, Mark Steyn, but the government bully, gaggers of free speech failed and the same will happen here.

It's just a shame and HG states the PC Bullies are persueing this matter. I guess it makes 'em feel important. Frankly, they are IMPOTENT and that's most of their pea-brain problem.

Heres a link to Mark Steyn's blog, which will shed some light on the up-coming Meyer's inquision:

http://www.steynonline.com/content/blogcategory/15/100/

Alistair McCarstairs said...

Myers' article was cold, heartless and cynical. True, maybe or maybe not, brave certainly but also cold, heartless and cynical. That'll never make a good impression. The masses are inclined towards the emotional more than the rational. But now that these thought quangos have been suitably enraged into knee jerk folly they reveal themselves to be the crude and absurd Orwellian state sanctioned lynch-mobs that they really are.

The ICI and "the National Consultative Committe on Paranoia and Lynching" are a tiny corps of trumped up thought police ran by perpetually stressed out ideological excitables. Instead of issuing a rebuttal they grass him straight up to the authorities!

McCarthy-ism for the otherside. Only hope this time there's enough dissenters from our-side to rescue Myers from martyrdom.

Ed said...

This site is well worth checking out if any of you are in doubt as to the validity of Myers claims.

http://www.optimumpopulation.org

kerdasi amaq said...

Political Correctness is not intended to help those people on whose behalf it takes up the cudgels.
It's real target is to BULLY in to submission and silence anyone who is capable of independent thought or critical analysis.

Political Correctness gives a licence to indulge in verbal bullying and it is important that people recognise this and see it for what it is.

Anonymous said...

What can be done to help him? Could he get a lawyer and make this very public? His free speech at stake? could be a landmark case and bring some things to a head.

Sebastian Flyte said...

The great thing about the Mukandi article in the times is how it just repeats what Myers says. It's like free advertisment. Mukandi thinks he's being cute and tounge-in-cheek, but all it reads like is a copy and paste of Myers words. 'Good black and bad black': I'd never heard of that before. Now Mukandi has spread the idea everywhere, because his response was vague waffle.

geronimo mctavish said...

PC is also about showing you care practical help to anyone else is irrelevent.

"Hi Im liberal/leftie. I care so I'm better than you."